Election of Zacatecas’ capital annulled

141
Foto: Cortesía

The Electoral Court of the State of Zacatecas (TRIJEZ), with a tie vote and with the casting vote of the presiding magistrate Gloria Esparza Rodarte, annulled the election for Mayor of the capital of Zacatecas, so it did not recognize the victory of Miguel Varela Pinedo and left the results without effect and revoked the certificate of majority delivered by the Electoral Institute of the State.

The proposal for annulment was from the report of magistrate José Ángel Yuen Reyes and had the vote of Magistrate Gloria Esparza Rodarte who, having the Presidency of the jurisdictional body, prevailed over the votes against magistrates Rocío Posadas and Teresa Rodríguez Torres, so now it will be left in the hands of the candidates to continue and appeal before the regional chamber of the Electoral Court of the Judicial Branch of the Federation.

Likewise, by unanimous vote, the Electoral Court of Justice ratified the victories of the candidates for mayors of Guadalupe and Villanueva, respectively, thus nullifying the challenge made by the PRI and the PRD, respectively.

As such, José Saldivar Mayor was ratified as the winning candidate in the election of Guadalupe and Rogelio González “chailito” was ratified as the winner of the election for municipal president of Villanueva.


Position of Magistrate José Ángel Yuen Reyes

It is an integral proposal and all the reasons for disagreement were valued, said Magistrate José Ángel Yuen Reyes, who justified the substantial violations that transgressed democracy.

He said that the proposal shows a series of irregularities and lack of certainty in the results.

An impartial act of the local authority (IEEZ) in suggesting voting for the parties of the coalition; AS WELL AS AN OVEREXPOSURE IN RADIO STATIONS WHERE ONE CAN INFER CONTRACTING UNLAWFUL, AND THE RELIGIOUS ORIGIN OF THE ACCESSING AGREEMENT OF THE MEMBERS OF THE SAN JUAN BAUTISTA BROTHERHOOD.

It proved a violation of the principle of equity in the contest, by carrying out early campaign acts outside the timeframes and territorial limits of its competence, as these were constant and early positions. Therefore, the qualitative determining impact on the election, as these were systematic conducts.

The project has a firm, logical and supported basis with the basis that appears in the records, and was determined without influence from absolutely anyone.

Position of the Presiding Judge Gloria Esparza Rodarte
In the case of this file, it is possible to deduce acts carried out by the candidate Miguel Varela that transgressed the constitutional principles.

He said that there were acts of the administrative authority (IEEZ) that affected the principles of impartiality, and, therefore, he charged partial acts in favor of the candidate of the “Fuerza y ​​Corazón por Zacatecas”.

He also assured that the principle of equity was violated by hiring 16 radio interviews promoting his image and calling for a vote in favor of his candidacy.

And finally, he also considered that the constitutional principle of separation of church and state was violated, since he had a press conference with the directors of the Morismas de Bracho.

And finally, he also violated the principle of equity by making his report of work as a federal deputy outside the district constituency for which he was elected, and where he deployed electoral advertising before the beginning of the electoral campaigns.

Source: imagenzac